@article{oai:seisen.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000608,
 author = {今野, 真二 and コンノ, シンジ and KONNO, Shinji},
 journal = {清泉女子大学人文科学研究所紀要},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {P(論文), 江戸期に出版された版本が明治期に書写されたものを「明治の写本」と呼ぶことにする。そうした明治の写本は文学研究においては、採りあげられることはほとんどない。しかし、実際はそうしたものがある程度のひろがりをもって存在していることが推測される。本稿では、稿者が所持する明治十九年に写された『夢想兵衛胡蝶物語』（文化七年刊）を分析対象とした。版本と写本との対照によって、さまざまな言語事象についての知見を得ることができた。写本の振仮名においては、版本の語形の短呼形を振仮名として施している例が少なからずあり、当該時期に長音形／短呼形に「揺れ」が生じていた可能性がある。, A textbook that was published in the Edo Period was reproduced in the Meiji Period.  This type of textbook is not generally considered as valuable in the field of literature research.  However, in some cases, it can be accepted as a valid resource material in the field of linguistics.  The Japanese language has changed over the years from the Edo Period to the Meiji Period.  Such a process of change can be seen by comparing the textbook published in the Edo Period with the textbooks reproduced in the Meiji Period.  From the contrast examined in this paper, with regards to whether the prolonged sound was recognized or not in the Meiji Period, it was pointed out that the word form may have been deviated.  Moreover, it was also found that there may have a deviation in the special syllables such as the geminated consonant and the syllabic nasal.  Furthermore, in order to indicate the inflectional form of the subjective case and the objective case, differences in whether the particle has been used or not can be found in both textbooks, however, it was concluded that such a condition constantly exists in the Japanese language.},
 pages = {41--67},
 title = {明治の写本},
 volume = {35},
 year = {2014}
}